Introduction
Organic
pollutants produced because of industrial and agricultural activities have been
one of the hazardous comprehensive issues in current years. Maximum pollutants
are added into the environment by industrial waste comprises of organic and
inorganic contaminants which has adverse effects on living systems. The release
of pollutants into our environment
whether inadvertently or due to human activities is the foremost cause of water
and soil pollution (Holliger et al. 1997; Sachan
et al. 2019). This drain off of wastewater into the environment also results in the spoil of water used for domestic and
agricultural consumptions. Among these pollutants, phenol which is the basic
structural unit of a wide variety of synthetic organics (Agarry and Solomon
2008) is grouped as priority pollutant by the United States of environmental
protection agency (US-EPA 1979). Phenol is used as a solvent, as an antiseptic
and as an additive in disinfectants (Pan and Kurumada 2008). Due to high level
utilization of phenol in industries, a remarkable amount is added to the environment
and possesses toxicity (Su et al. 2018) against all form of life
including human, plant and microorganisms. In humans, acute exposure to phenol
by the oral route leads to damage to blood, liver, kidney and cardiac toxicity,
including weak pulse, cardiac depression, and reduced blood pressure (Mohanty
and Jena 2017). Phenol is also harmful to the non-living environment. Effects
on the non-living environment include damage to structures by acidic air
pollutants, effects on the ozone layer and earth’s heat balance and reduced
visibility.
Phenol take the 11th place under the 129
chemicals with a discharge limit of lower to one mg L-1 in the
treated effluent in order to human health protection from the possible toxic
effects caused by exposure to phenol (Tor et al. 2006). Its removal from
environment is mandatory to meet the goal of clean environment. Many methods
are in practice for phenol removal from the environment
such as incineration, chemical oxidation,
adsorption, coagulation, photolytic degradation (Al-Dawery et al. 2019),
photolytic degradation (Feng et al. 2020) and bioremediation (Jaber et al. 2020). However, attention
is given to bioremediation for the
reasons of
its
environment-friendly nature and less cost as compared with
physical or
chemical remediation techniques.
Many microorganisms (fungi, bacteria, algae, and archaea) are endowed with phenol degrading
property. After bacteria, fungi are well evaluated for phenol degradation.
Jiang et al. (2015) reported phenol degrading efficiency of a fungus
belonged to the genus Candida which
was isolated from activated sludge collected from a pharmaceutical plant which
had the potential to degrade up to 800 mg L-1 phenol in 72 h.
Another study conducted by Santos and Linardi (2004) explored Graphium spp.
and Fusarium spp. for phenol
degrading potential which were able to degrade 75% of 10 mM phenol in
168 h. Many algal strains are also reported which are equipped with phenol
degrading potential. Cheng et al. (2017) employed Tribonema minus (Algae) for elimination of 700 mg L-1
phenol from industrial effluent and Priyadharshini and
Bakthavatsalam (2016) reported
phenol degradation by Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Among the microorganisms,
bacteria are well documented for phenol degradation because of simple structure,
simple genome, and less expensive in handling in term of culturing and
utilization. A lot of members of bacterial genera are characterized for phenol
degrading potential. These genera comprise Rhodococcus,
Bacillus, Lysinibacillus, Pseudomonas, Comamonas, Acinetobacter and
Halomonas etc. (Ahmad et al. 2015).
Few reports are available on phenol biodegradation at
different environmental conditions like pH, temperature, and NaCl and
biodegradation in such conditions is grossly neglected in Pakistan. There was a
need to isolate bacterial strain from our own environment which are efficient in degrading phenol. Keeping in view this gap
the aim of this study was to identify and characterize bacterial strains
capable of utilizing phenol at different pH, temperature, and NaCl
concentrations.
Materials and Methods
This
research work was carried out in National Institute for Genomics and Advanced
Biotechnology (NIGAB), Islamabad. Chemicals used in this research were
purchased from SIGMA-ALDRICH (Germany). Phenol used in this study was of
analytical grade.
Isolation and purification
Industrial
waste was collected from Industrial area 1–9, Islamabad (33.6607°N, 73.0639°E).
Twenty ml of waste was mixed with 80 mL of mineral salt medium (MSM) broth
supplemented with 100 mg L-1 phenol as a single energy source, and
placed on a shaker at 28°C. MSM was prepared according to Ahmad et al.
(2015). After seven days of
enrichment, 0.5 mL of this sample was spread on MSM agar plates containing 100
mg L-1 phenol as a sole source of carbon and energy and incubated at
28°C till visible bacterial growth. After full growth of the colonies, single
and pure colonies were picked and streaked on Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) plates and
incubated at 28°C. This process was repeated until
the isolation of pure culture. Growth of many strains were observed and named
as NIGAB-1, NIGAB-2, NIGAB-3, NIGAB-4 and so on. All
the strains were preserved at -80°C in 70% glycerol. Isolated strains were
morphologically characterized by observing colony shape, color, opacity,
elevation etc. Our strain of interest which showed best growth on TSA plate was
NIGAB-4.
Identification and phylogenetic
analysis
NIGAB-4
was identified through 16S rRNA gene. On TSA plate NIGAB-4 was first grown. In
PCR tubes 20 µL of Tris EDTA (TE) buffer was added, 2–3 few colonies of
NIGAB-4 were added, and homogenized using vortex machine. Then the PCR tubes
were placed at 95°C for 10 min in a thermal
cycler. The culture was centrifuged at
12000 rpm for 10 min and the supernatant
was collected and used as template DNA. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified with forward primer 9F (5-GAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3) and
reverse primer 1510R (5-GGCTACCTTGTTACGA-3) followed a PCR program used by
Ahmad et al. (2015). Amplified
products were confirmed by gel electrophoresis (1%) and purified using
commercially available DNA purification kit (Invitrogen). Purified products
were sequenced using internal primers 27F (5-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3) and 1492R
(5-ACCTTGTTACGACTT-3) from Macrogen, Korea.
The sequences obtained from Macrogen Korea were
trimmed in BioEdit software (v. 7.0.9.0.) to get the
refined sequences and the contig assembly was constructed in DNA Dragon (v.
1.7.0). The assembled consensus sequence was BLAST (Basic Local Alignment
Search Tool) search using ezbiocloud
Server (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/) to retrieve sequences of 16S rRNA gene of
closely related validly published species for exact identification of our
strain. On the basis of maximum identity score, sequences were selected and
alignment was performed in Clustal W (version 1.6) (Thompson et al.
1994). A phylogenetic tree was created
with the use of the Neighbor-Joining
algorithm in MEGA-5 (Tamura et al.
2011).
Biochemical characterization
Consumption
of different carbon sources by the isolated strain was determined using API 20E
kit (bioMerieux, France) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. NIGAB-4 was
first grown on TSA plates. Few pure colonies (16 to 18 h old culture) of
isolated stain were added in 0.85% saline solution and the microtubes of API
20E kit were filled with prepared inoculums. The kits were then placed in an incubator at 28°C for 24–48 h. The results were
recorded according to color change.
Phenol tolerance
NIGAB-4
was tested for its tolerance to various initial concentrations of phenol (0,
200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, and 1400 mg L-1). This experiment
was performed in MSM broth containing phenol as the only carbon source. Blank
(MSM broth with phenol without inoculation) of each treatment was run in
parallel to determine the bacterial growth. NIGAB-4 was inoculated in ten mL of
MSM broth containing phenol and incubated at 30°C. After visible growth, 500 µL
aliquot was taken and added to 250 mL flasks containing the aforementioned
concentrations of phenol. Growth was checked at the specific interval by taking
OD at 600 nm using a spectrophotometer. The experiment was performed in
triplicate.
Phenol degradation
Phenol
degrading efficiency of the isolated
strain was determined in MSM broth augmented with 0, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000,
1200, and 1400 mg L-1 phenol at 30°C and pH 7. Initial reading was
taken at 0 h of inoculation and the subsequent readings were taken with the
internal of 12 h. One mL of the aliquot was harvested at each interval,
centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 10 min. The
supernatant was checked for remaining phenol. Two types of control were
used in parallel, 1) MSM broth containing phenol (0–1400 mg L-1) and
was without inoculum (Abiotic control). Another
control was MSM broth without phenol and with bacterial culture (Biotic
control). This experiment was performed in triplicate. Phenol was identified on
the basis of external standards (50, 100, 150, 300, 500 mg L-1) and
residues were quantified using High-Performance
Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) according to Ahmad et al. (2014).
Optimization of physiological parameter
for phenol degradation
At
different pH, temperature, and NaCl concentrations, phenol degrading potential
of this strain was checked. Two phenol concentrations (200 and 400 mg L-1)
were used to determine the optimum temperature,
and pH, and 200 mg L-1 phenol was used to determine the range of
NaCl concentrations in which this strain can degrade phenol.
Temperature optimization
NIGAB-4
was checked for 200 and 400 mg L-1 phenol degradation at 0, 15, 20,
30, 37, 40, 45 and 50°C. This strain was first grown in MSM broth (10 mL)
containing 100 mg L-1 phenol and 500 µL of the grown culture
was added in 50 mL of MSM broth at the aforementioned temperatures and at pH 7.
Growth was checked by taking OD at 600 nm
at a time interval of 12 h by comparing
with the OD of respective blanks. At 12 h time interval, one mL of the culture
was harvested, centrifuged at 10000 × g
for 10 min and remaining phenol quantity was determined using HPLC. Abiotic control
was run in parallel with each concentration. This experiment was performed in
triplicate.
pH optimization
The same experimental design
was used for pH optimization; however, in
this experiment pH 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 11 were used. The optimum temperature
for phenol degradation was used in pH optimization. pH
range in which this strain can degrade phenol and optimum pH was determined. This experiment was performed
in triplicate.
NaCl optimization
Phenol
degradation at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10% NaCl concentration
was checked. For this purpose, the above mentioned NaCl concentrations were
prepared. Pre-culture of 0.5 mL was inoculated in fifty mL of MSM broth
augmented with 200 mg L-1 phenol. Optimum temperature and pH
determined were used for this experiment. Range and optimum NaCl concentration were determined. Growth was checked by taking OD at 600 nm at a time interval of 12 h by comparing with the OD
of respective blanks. At 12 h time interval, one mL of the culture was
harvested, centrifuged at 10000 rpm for
10 min and remaining phenol quantity was determined using HPLC. This experiment
was performed in triplicate.
Molecular detection of phenol degrading
pathway
Genes,
C12O and C23O responsible for phenol degradation were
determined to check the pathway acquired
by the isolated strain. For this purpose, genomic DNA was extracted by CTAB method (William et al. 2012). C12O gene was amplified
with primers, C12OF (5- GCCAACGTCGACGTCTGGCAGCA-3) and C12OR (5-
CGCCTTCAAAGTTGATCTGCGTGGTTGGT-3) and C23O gene was
amplified using primers, C23OF (5-AAGAGGCATGGGGGCGCACCGGTTCGA-3), and C23OR
(5-TCACCAGCAAACACCTCGTTGCGGTTGCC-3) according to
the PCR protocol proposed by Sei et al. (1999). Amplified products were
visualized on 1% agarose gel. Marker (100 bp) was used for quantification of
the bands.
Results
A total of eight bacterial strains were isolated
from industrial waste of I-9, Islamabad among which NIGAB-4 was selected for
its phenol degrading potential. This strain was gram-positive.
Colony morphology was determined and it was found that the shape of the colony
was circular with entire margins and rough surface. Colony elevation was crateform with pink color and opaque in nature.
Identification
of isolated strains
NIGAB-4 was identified as a member of the genus Lysinibacillus the closest phylogenetic neighbors were Lysinibacillus fusiformis (AB271743), Lysinibacillus mangiferihumi (JF731238) and Lysinibacillus sphaericus (AUOZ01000024) which shared 99.49, 98.73 and 98.8
sequence percent identity, respectively (Table 1). Phylogenetic analysis
confirmed the affiliation of NIGAB-4 with Lysinibacillus
fusiformis NBRC 15717T (AB271743)
with the Bootstrap value of 98% (Fig. 1). The sequence obtained from Macrogen Korea was
submitted to DDBJ with the accession number MH602434. The length of assembly
made for NIGAB-4 was 1348 nucleotides.
Biochemical characterization
Table 2 shows the biochemical characterization of NIGAB-4. After
48 h of incubation, the strain NIGAB-4 was weakly positive for
β-galactosidase and Citrate and
positive for Gelatinase, Indole
production, and oxidation/fermentation of Glucose Melibiose Saccharose and Sorbitol while negative for utilization of Arginine, production
of H2S, Lysine decarboxylase, Ornithine decarboxylase, Sodium
pyruvate, Tryptophan deaminase, Urease, fermentation/oxidation of Amygdalin
Arabinose Mannitol and Rhamnose.
Phenol tolerance
NIGAB-4
was incubated for 96 h to check its tolerance to the mentioned concentrations.
No growth was perceived at 0, and 1400 mg L-1 phenol concentration. A good growth was observed in MSM broth
containing 200–1000 mg L-1 phenol. Optimum growth was observed at
800 mg L-1 phenol. Little growth was noted at 1200 mg L-1
phenol. Up to 600 mg L-1 phenol, no lag was observed. Maximum growth
at 200 mg L-1 phenol was recorded after 36 h of incubation (OD =
0.7). After 36 h, decline phase was started and the optical density reduces to
0.27 after 96 h. At 400 mg L-1 phenol highest OD was recorded as
0.61 after 60 h. A decline phase was started afterward
and the OD value reduces to 0.43 after 60
h of total incubation time. At 600 mg L-1 maximum growth (OD = 0.96)
was noted at 72 h of incubation. Decline phase initiated after 72 h delineated
by the reduction in OD which was 0.78 after 96 h of incubation. At 800 mg L-1
phenol, maximum growth was achieved as indicated by OD which was 1.32 after 72
h of incubation and afterward reduces to
0.91 after 96 h. At 1000 mg L-1 phenol, a lag phase for 24 h was
noted and overall the growth was slow and highest OD (0.66) was observed after
84 h. A lengthy lag phase was observed for 60 h was observed at 1200 mg L-1
phenol and the maximum growth achieved having the OD 0.38 after 96 h of
incubation. No growth was observed at 1400 mg L-1 phenol (data not displayed)
(Fig. 2).
Phenol degradation
For
quantification of degraded phenol, six external standards were run (50, 100,
150, 300, 500 and 800 mg L-1). Residual phenol in the aliquot was
measured by employing the equation achieved from the regression analysis of the
external standards, for which the R2 and adjusted R2
value were recorded as 98.05 and 96%, respectively (Fig. 3).
Table 1:
Identification of NIGAB-4 isolated from industrial waste
Strain |
Closest
Match |
Identity
(%) |
Coverage
(%) |
Taxonomy |
NIGAB-4 (MH602434) |
Lysinibacillus fusiformis (AB271743) |
99.49 |
100 |
Bacteria; Firmicutes; Bacilli; Bacillales;
Planococcaceae; Lysinibacillus; |
Lysinibacillus mangiferihumi (JF731238) |
98.73 |
98.44 |
||
Lysinibacillus sphaericus (AUOZ01000024) |
98.8 |
100 |
||
Lysinibacillus xylanilyticus (LFXJ01000007) |
97.84 |
100 |
||
Lysinibacillus pakistanensis (BBDJ01000063) |
97.82 |
91.52 |
||
Lysinibacillus contaminans (KC254732) |
97.57 |
97.22 |
Table 2: Biochemical Characterization of NIGAB-4
using API 20E kit
S. No. |
Biochemical tests |
Result |
S. No |
Biochemical tests |
Results |
1 |
β-galactosidase |
w |
Fermentation/oxidation of: |
||
2 |
Arginine dihydrolase |
- |
12 |
Amygdalin |
- |
3 |
Citrate utilization |
w |
13 |
Arabinose |
- |
4 |
Gelatinase |
+ |
14 |
Glucose |
+ |
5 |
H2S production |
- |
15 |
Inositol |
- |
6 |
Indole production |
+ |
16 |
Mannitol |
- |
7 |
Lysine decarboxylase |
- |
17 |
Melibiose |
+ |
8 |
Ornithine decarboxylase |
- |
18 |
Rhamnose |
- |
9 |
Sodium pyruvate |
- |
19 |
Saccharose |
+ |
10 |
Tryptophan deaminase |
- |
20 |
Sorbitol |
+ |
11 |
Urease |
- |
|
w weakly positive, + positive, - negative
Fig. 1: Phylogenetic tree showing inter-relationship of Lysinibacillus
spp. NIGAB-4 with closely related species of the genus Lysinibacillus
inferred from 16S rRNA gene sequences. The tree was generated using Neighbor-joining
algorithm contained in Mega 5.0 software package. Bootstrap values (only
>70% are shown) expressed as a percentage
of 1000 replications. Bar sequence divergence was 2%. Paenibacillus polymxa NCDO1774T (AJ320493)
was used as a root. Accession number of each type strain is shown in
parentheses
No phenol degrading activity was noted at 0, 1400 mg L-1
and abiotic control. At 200 mg L-1 phenol, NIGAB-4 was incubated for
a total period of 60 h and this strain
had the capability to completely degrade such concentration in 48 h. Highest
degradation was observed at 12 h of incubation at which 46% phenol was
mineralized. The R2 value was recorded as 99.2% and average
degradation rate was noted as 3.26 mg L-1 h-1. Maximum
degradation rate was noted at 12 h of incubation for which degradation rate was
7.73 mg L-1/h. This strain was able to degrade 400 mg L-1
phenol 48 h. At 12, 24 and 36 h of incubation, 39.08, 67.24 and 90.16% phenol
degradation was recorded, respectively. The R2 value was recorded as
99.94% and average degradation rate was noted as 6.6 mg L-1 h-1.
Maximum degradation rate was noted at 12 h of incubation for which degradation
rate was 13.02 mg L-1 h-1. This strain was capable of
degrading 600 mg L-1 phenol in 72 h. Highest phenol degradation was
observed at 36–48 h of incubation which was about 23% of the total phenol
supplemented. The R2 value for
this degradation was recorded as 98.8% and the average degradation rate was
noted as 7.09 mg L-1 h-1. Maximum degradation rate was
noted at 24 h of incubation for which degradation rate was 9.35 mg L-1 h-1.
No lag phase found for 200 and 400 mg L-1 phenol. NIGAB-4 had the
potential to degrade 800 mg L-1 phenol in 96 h, however, a lag phase of 24 h was observed in
which 3.31% phenol mineralization was observed. Highest phenol degradation was
observed at 48–60 h of incubation which was about 28% of the total phenol
supplemented. The R2 value for
this degradation was 94.7% and average degradation rate was noted as 7.35 mg L-1
h-1. Maximum degradation rate was noted at 60 h of incubation
for which degradation rate was 18.84 mg L-1 h-1. The
selected strain was found not capable of degrading 1000 mg L-1 and
in the entire time course and only 43% of
the total phenol was degraded. A lag phase of 48 h was observed in which 6.86%
phenol mineralization was observed. A very slow degradation rate was observed
which indicates the toxicity of this concentration to NIGAB-4. The R2 value for this degradation was
recorded as 95.8% and average degradation rate was noted as 2.76 mg L-1 h-1.
Maximum degradation rate was noted at 60 h of incubation for which degradation
rate was 9 mg L-1 h-1. Only 10% phenol degradation was
detected at 1200 mg L-1 phenol (Fig. 4).
Fig. 2: The growth of NIGAB-4 in MSM
supplemented with different phenol concentrations (0-200 mg L-1).
Blank of each concentration was used for comparing growth
Fig. 3: External standers of phenol used for quantification of degraded phenol
Optimization of physiological parameter for phenol degradation
Temperature optimization: NIGAB-4 was checked for 200 and 400 mg L-1
phenol degradation at 0, 15, 20, 30, 37, 40, 45 and 50°C. The bacterial growth
was measured by taking optical density at 600 nm. MSM broth containing these
two concentrations was inoculated at pH 7. No phenol degradation was recorded
at 0, 15 and 50°C. NIGAB-4 was incubated for a total
period of 36 h at 200 mg L-1 at given temperatures. It was found
that this strain has the potential to degrade phenol in the range of 20–45°C. This strain was able to
degrade 100% phenol at 30°C where the OD reached to 0.61. At 37°C, 64.5%
(OD=0.49) of the total phenol was degraded by this strain followed by
degradation at 40°C (58.35%) and at this concentration,
the OD was recorded as 0.34. Only 13.61% phenol degradation was observed at 20°C
(OD=0.24). At 45°C 11.45% phenol degradation was observed. At 400 mg L-1,
this strain was incubated for 36 h and 100% phenol degradation was observed at
30°C (OD=0.74) followed by degradation at 37°C where 73.24% of phenol
degradation was observed (OD=0.62). At 40°C 49.53% phenol degradation was
recorded where OD reached to 0.57. At 20 and 45°C, 12.059 and 13.02% phenol
degradation was recorded, respectively (Fig. 5a).
pH optimization
For
pH optimization, NIGAB-4 was subjected to degrade 200 and 400 mg L-1
phenol at 30°C and pH 4–10 in MSM broth for a total period of 36 h. NIGAB-4 has
the potential to degrade these phenol concentrations in the range of pH 6–9. This strain was able to
degrade almost 100% of both phenol concentrations at pH 7. OD reached at 200
and 400 mg L-1 phenol was recorded as 0.58 and 0.623 at this pH. At
pH 6, NIGAB-4 was able to degrade 534.87% (OD=0.36) and 22.04% (OD=0.46) of 200
and 400 mg L-1 phenol, respectively. OD value of 0.401 and 0.48 was
achieved at pH 8 where 45.27 and 34.24% of 200 and 400 mg L-1 phenol
degradation was observed, respectively. At pH 5 negligible amount of phenol
degradation was observed while at pH 9 very low phenol degradation was observed. At pH 9, 8.6%
(OD=0.18) and 7.4% (OD=0.26) of 200 and 400 mg L-1 phenol
degradation was observed, respectively (Fig. 5b).
NaCl optimization
Fig. 4: Degradation of phenol (200 - 1200 mg L-1 phenol)
in MSM broth and percent degradation of NIGAB-4 with respect to time. Phenol ( 0 mg L-1 Abiotic controlPhenol degradationPercent Removal)
Fig. 5: Percent removal of 200 and 400 mg L-1 phenol by NIGAB-4 at
different temperatures (a) and pH (b). Phenol 200 mg L-1 Phenol
400 mg L-1 Growth at 200 mg L-1
phenol Growth at 400 mg L-1 phenol . Growth is given in term of
optical density.
NIGAB-4
was incubated at pH 7 and 30°C in 200 mg L-1 phenol with the
aforementioned concentration of NaCl for 84 h. The strain was able to
completely degrade 200 mg L-1 phenol at 0 and 2% NaCl.
At 0% NaCl, 200 mg L-1 phenol was degraded in 48 h, where the maximum value of OD was reached 0.53. No lag
phase was found at this NaCl concentration. At 2% NaCl, this strain was able to
degrade 200 mg L-1 in 72 h. The lag phase of 12 h was recorded. The highest
OD was recorded at 48 h of incubation and a stationary phase was observed
between 48–60 h of incubation. At 4% NaCl, 69.5% of 200 mg L-1
phenol degradation was observed in the entire time course. The lag phase of 24 h was noted. The highest
growth was recorded at 60 h of incubation where the OD reached to 0.27. After
72 h decline phase was initiated. At 6% NaCl, only 45 mg L-1 phenol
of 200 mg L-1 degradation was recorded. A lag phase of 36 h was
observed. Highest OD was obtained at 48 h of
incubation where OD reached to 0.14. Afterward
decline phase was started. At the rest of NaCl concentrations, no phenol
degradation was observed (Fig. 6).
Molecular detection of phenol metabolic
pathway
The
aim of this experiment was to determine the pathway through which phenol is
catabolized by the presence/absence of C12O and C23O genes. No amplification
was observed of C12O and C23O genes. After running the amplified products on a gel, the band for C23O gene was observed which was 900 bp.
This size is the characteristic size of the amplified
product of this gene using the primers mentioned in materials and methods
section. The absence of band in control (negative control) showed the
authenticity of this experiment (no contamination). This observation showed
that all the strains acquired meta-pathway for phenol degradation.
Fig. 6: Degradation of 200 mg L-1 phenol by NIGAB-4 at different
concentrations of NaCl
Discussion
Phenol
degrading bacteria are naturally found in diverse habitat including soil
(Gayathri and Vasudevan 2010), plant leaves (Sandhu et al. 2009),
activated slug, waste-water (Banerjee and Ghoshal
2010), industrial waste (Ahmad et al. 2015) and water (Tambekar et al.
2013). The presence of phenol-degrading
bacteria in such diverse habitats provides
the evidence of the widespread distribution of this trait. Among
the eight morphologically and biochemically distinct bacterial strains, Lysinibacillus spp. NIGAB-4 was selected for phenol degradation because of its good
growth after enrichment in phenol containing MSM
plates. Source and physiological parameters of samples affect the efficiency of bacterial strains
regarding phenol degradation. Efficient phenol degraders can be isolate from the sources where phenol or its derivatives are present. For isolation
of our strains, we selected industrial waste which is reported to have the
maximum chances of the existing of hydrocarbon-degrading
bacteria and the persistent bacterial strains are normally well-adopted (Hamitouche
et al. 2012). Majority of bacterial strains present in the environment are endowed with phenol degrading
property while the ability of some
strains is enhanced through enrichment in
phenol containing medium. This technique
enhances the reduction of phenol toxicity through adaptation and the potential
of biodegradation. This eminence is naturally gifted because of the presence of genes in bacterial genomes allow
bacteria to withstand with stress
conditions (Alexander 1999).
The strain used in this study was identified on the
basis of 16S rRNA gene. This technique is the benchmark for identification bacterial species nowadays. Gürtler and Mayall (2001) stated that
sequence analysis of the genes encoding rRNA, usually 16S rRNA, has been
well-established as a standard procedure for the identification of bacteria at
the levels of species, genera, and family. The exact taxonomic position of
bacteria is extensively determined on the basis of 16S rRNA gene to avoid
ambiguity produced through identification only on morphological
characteristics. This method is preferred over other methods because of some
advantages including the presence of this
gene in all bacteria length of this gene is enough to get information,
conservation of gene function and the availability of a huge computerized
database for comparing the query sequence (Patel 2001). The databases
used in this study are DDBJ and Ez-Taxon server. The Ez-Taxon server was
preferred because of containing the sequences of validly published bacterial
species.
NIGAB-4 was able to tolerate 1000 mg L-1
phenol. To some extent this strain possess tolerance up to 1200 mg L-1
phenol, however, the growth was inhibited when 1400 mg L-1 phenol
was used. Bacterial resistance to high phenol concentration is considered as
natural or change and mutation in the gene
pool (Ajaz et al. 2004). May be
horizontal gene transfer plays a role in this regard. Bacteria possess
tolerance to pollutant to ensure its survival in unfavorable conditions.
Tolerance to phenol by bacteria is well documented and a lot of bacterial
strains are reported which are able to tolerate phenol (Pradeep et al.
2015). At high concentration of phenol, bacterial growth is inhibited due to
substrate toxicity. This may be due to low production of bacterial own growth
metabolites at high concentration of phenol.
Phenol degrading ability of NIGAB-4 was
checked at different concentrations of phenol. This strain had the potential to
degrade completely maximum 800 mg L-1 phenol in 96 h. Only 10% of
1200 mg L-1 phenol was degraded and no degradation occurred when
1400 mg L-1 phenol was used as the only energy and carbon source.
With the increase in phenol concentration, degradation efficiency of this
degraded due to substrate toxicity. Our results are substantiate with the that
of Jame et al. (2010) with a little variation who determined the
degradation of 800 mg L-1 phenol in 72 h by a strain Pseudomonas FA. Degradation time of a
particular phenol concentration by the member of different genera or even
species of the same genus may be different which is not surprising. For
Instant, Pseudomonas FA degraded 800
mg L-1 phenol in 72 h while, other members of this genus (Pseudomonas SA, TK and KA) was unable to
degrade such amount of phenol even in 96 h Jame et al. (2010). strains
of the Lysinibacillus genus are
reported for phenol degradation (Lin et al. 2010; Ahmad et al.
2015). Bacillus fusiformis (now Lysinibacillus fusiformis Ahmed et al. 2007) is also reported for phenol
degradation in the presence of iron-based nano-particles (Kuang et al. 2013).
Similarly, phenol tolerance and phenol degradation may not be confused. A
strain will tolerate a particular amount of phenol but it is not necessary to
degrade that amount. For example, Liu et al. (2016) reported the degradation
of 800 mg L-1 phenol by Acinetobacter
calcoaceticus but can grow up to 1700 mg L-1.
Physiology parameter like Temperature,
pH, and NaCl concentration was optimized for phenol degradation. It was found
that temperature 37°C, pH 7 and 0% NaCl were optimum for this strain to degrade
phenol.
The temperature was optimized for
phenol degradation for this strain when 200 and 400 mg L-1 phenol
was employed. Temperature 30°C was found optimum for the degradation of such
concentrations. The second highest degradation rate was recorded at 37°C
followed by 40°C. Temperature
optimization for phenol degradation is not yet reported for this strain
however, the phylogenetic neighbors of our strain are reported for degradation
of other organic compounds for which the optimum temperature was recorded as
30°C. Chantarasiri and Boontanom (2017) reported lignin degradation by Lysinibacillus sphaericus for which the optimum temperature was 30°C. For
naphthalene degradation by Bacillus fusiformis (BFN), optimum temperature was
recorded as 30°C. At lower and higher temperatures than 30°C, reduction in
biodegradation of phenol was observed. At higher temperature, metabolic
activities are reduced due to less solubility of O2 (Bamforth and
Singleton 2005). Reduction in phenol degradation below and above 30°C
designates that NIGAB-4 is mesophilic in nature. Bayoumi and Abdul-Hamd (2010)
reported 30○C as the optimum temperature for phenol
degradation by a bacterium.
NIGAB-4 was able to degrade 200–400 mg
L-1 phenol in pH rang of 6–9 in which the optimum pH was 7. Phenol
degradation at different pH values are not yet reported for this strain,
however, normal growth on TSA medium under different pH was determined and the
optimum was found as 7 (Priest et al. 1988). So, finding microbes for their best degradation
performance in this range is not astounding (Mentzer and Ebere 1996). At pH 8,
45 and 35% of 200 and 400 mg L-1 was degradation respectively, which
shows the tendency of this strain towards the alkaline environment. Phenol
degrading efficiency decreased below and above the neutral pH. This is due to
the dependency of phenol degradation on pH which affects the surface charge of
the absorbent and the degree of
ionization (Annadurai et al. 2000). It is observed that neutral pH favor
bacterial growth. The reason behind the phenomenon is the stability and
efficiency of most enzymes at neutral pH. Change in pH results in a minimum or complete loss of enzymatic activity.
Another theory revealed that at extreme low or high pH acids or bases enter the
bacterial cells easily because they tend to exist in un-dissociated form under
these conditions and electrostatic force cannot stop them from inflowing to
bacterial cells, which in turn affects the metabolic pathway of the organism
(Robertson and Alexander 1992; Karigar et al. 2006).
NIGAB-4 was able to completely degrade 200 mg L-1
phenol at 0 and 2%. Degradation at 0% salinity shows the activeness of this
strain. With the increase in NaCl concentration from
2–4% the growth of this strain as well as phenol degradation reduced. At 6%
NaCl, only 45 mg L-1 phenol was degraded and no phenol degradation
was observed on onwards concentration. This study showed the efficient
degradation of 200 mg L-1 phenol, however,
at high salinity level, no phenol degradation was observed which proved the
toxicity of NaCl. This may be due to the
restriction in metabolism (Jiang et al.
2015). Phenol degradation by Lysinibacillus
spp. under different NaCl concentrations is not
yet reported, however, tolerance to NaCl in nutrient broth was checked
by Tomova et al. (2014) who reported the tolerance of a Lysinibacillus spp. up to 10% NaCl and was considered as moderately
halotolerant.
Phenol degradation results in the final products by two
pathways i.e., Ortho and Meta pathway
(Hill and Robinson 1975; Paller et al. 1995). This pathway can be
determined either by detection of specific intermediates or by detection of
genes involved in phenol degradation. In this study,
we observed the presence/absence of two genes named C12O and C23O. No
amplification of C12O gene was observed while,
C23O gene was amplified. A band size of nearly 900 bp was obtained which is the
characteristic size for C23O (Hesham et al. 2014). The C23O gene
amplification was observed which indicates that this strain degrades phenol via meta-pathway.
Conclusion
In
this study, we report the isolation,
enrichment, molecular identification, and phenol degrading potential of a Lysinibacillus spp. Moreover, phenol
degradation at various pH, temperature and NaCl concentrations was also carried
out. NIGAB-4 the closest phylogenetic neighbor of which is Lysinibacillus fusiformis (AB271743) is not yet reported for phenol biodegradation. This strain
tolerated 1200 mg L-1 phenol and has the potential to degrade 800 mg
L-1 phenol as a sole source of carbon and energy. Optimum pH and
temperature for 200–400 mg L-1 phenol degradation were 7 and 30°C,
respectively. This strain was able to degrade 200 mg L-1 phenol at
2% NaCl and the optimum concentration was 0%. This strain adopted meta-pathway
for phenol degradation being carried C23O gene. This strain is helpful in
bioremediation of phenol where there is a fluctuation
of physiological parameters.
Author Contributions
MRK and NA conceived
idea and designed the study. NA performed all the experiments. NA, MRK and GMA
analyzed the data. NA and MRK compiled the data and wrote the manuscript. MRK
provided the overall supervision and GMA provided the space.
References
Agarry SE, BO Solomon (2008). Kinetics of
batch microbial degradation of phenols by indigenous Pseudomonas fluorescence.
Intl J Environ Sci Technol 5:223‒232
Ahmad N, I Ahmed, M Iqbal, N Khalid, F Mehboob, K Ahad, GM
Ali (2015). Characterization and identification of phenol degrading bacteria
isolated from industrial waste. Pak J Agric Sci 52:219‒231
Ahmad
N, I Ahmed, A Shahzad, N Khalid, F Mehboob, K Ahad, GM Ali (2014). Molecular
identification and characterization of Pseudomonas
spp. NCCP-407 for phenol degradation isolated from industrial waste. J Kor Soc Appl Biol Chem 57:341‒346
Ahmed IA, A Yokota, Yamazoe, T Fujiwara (2007). Proposal
of Lysinibacillus boronitolerans gen.
nov. spp. nov. and transfer of Bacillus
fusiformis to Lysinibacillus
fusiformis comb. nov. and
Bacillus sphaericus to Lysinibacillus sphaericus comb. nov. Intl J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:1117‒1125
Ajaz M, N Noor, SA Rasool, SA Khan (2004). Phenol resistant bacteria from
soil: identification-characterization and genetical studies. Pak J Bot
36:415‒424
Alexander M (1999). Biodegradation and Bioremediation, 2nd
edn.
Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston, Texas, USA
Al-Dawery SK, SS Reddy, KA Riyami, ZS Nasser (2019). Removal of phenol from sewage
effluent using activated sludge coupled with photo-oxidation process. Asian
J Water Environ Pollut 16:81‒89
Annadurai G, SR Babu, KPO Mahesh, T
Murugesan (2000). Adsorption and bio-degradation of phenol by chitosan-immobilized Pseudomonas putida (NICM 2174). Bioprocess
Eng 22:493‒501
Bamforth SM, I Singleton (2005). Bioremediation of
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Current knowledge and future directions. J
Chem Technol Biotechnol 80:723‒736
Banerjee A, AK Ghoshal (2010). Phenol degradation by Bacillus cereus: pathway and kinetic
modeling. Bioresour Technol
101:5501‒5507
Bayoumi RA, AT Abdul-Hamd
(2010). Optimization of bacterial biodegradation of toluene
and phenol under different nutritional and environmental conditions. J
Appl Sci Res 6:1086‒1095
Chantarasiri A, P Boontanom (2017). Decolorization of
synthetic dyes by ligninolytic Lysinibacillus
sphaericus JD1103 isolated from Thai wetland ecosystems. Aquac Aquar Conserv Legisl 10:814‒819
Cheng T, W Zhang, W Zhang, G Yuan,
H Wang, T Liu (2017). An oleaginous filamentous microalgae Tribonema minus exhibits high removing potential of industrial
phenol contaminants. Bioresour Technol 238:749‒754
Feng C, Z Chen, J Jing, J Hou (2020). The
photocatalytic phenol degradation mechanism of Ag-modified ZnO nanorods.
J Mater Chem C 8:3000‒3009
Gayathri KV, V Namasivayam (2010). Enrichment
of phenol degrading moderately halophilic bacterial consortium from saline
environment. J Bioremed Biodegrad
1; Article 104
Gürtler V, BC Mayall (2001). Genomic approaches to
typing taxonomy and evolution of bacterial isolates. Intl J Syst Evol
Microbiol 51:3‒16
Hamitouche AE, Z Bendjama, A
Amrane, F Kaouah, D Hamane (2012). Relevance of the Luong model to describe the biodegradation
of phenol by mixed culture in a batch reactor. Ann Microbiol 62:581‒586
Hesham AEL, AM Mawad, YM
Mostafa, A Shoreit (2014). Study of enhancement and
inhibition phenomena and genes relating to degradation of petroleum polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons in isolated bacteria. Microbiol 83:599‒607
Hill GA, CW Robinson (1975). Substrate inhibition
kinetics: phenol degradation by Pseudomonas
putida. Biotechnol Bioeng 17:1599‒1615
Holliger C, S Gaspard, G
Glod, C Heijman, W Schumacher, RP Schwarzenbach, F Vazquez (1997). Contaminated environments in the
subsurface and bioremediation: Organic contaminants. FEMS Microbiol Rev
20:517‒523
Jaber S, A Lallement, M Sancelme, M Leremboure, G
Mailhot, B Ervens, AM Delort (2020). Biodegradation of phenol and catechol in cloud
water: comparison to chemical oxidation in the atmospheric multiphase system. Atmos
Chem Phys 20:4987‒4997
Jame SA, AR Alam, ANM Fakhruddin, MK Alam (2010).
Degradation of phenol by mixed culture of locally isolated Pseudomonas species. J Bioremed Biodegrad 1:102
Jiang Y, K Yang, H Wang, Y Shang, X Yang (2015).
Characteristics of phenol degradation in saline conditions of a halophilic
strain JS3 isolated from industrial activated sludge. Mar Pollut Bull 99:230‒234
Karigar C, A Mahesh, M Nagenahalli, DJ Yun (2006). Phenol degradation by immobilized cells of Arthrobacter citreus.
Biodegradation 17:47‒55
Kuang Y, Y Zhou, Z Chen, M Megharaj,
R Naidu (2013). Impact of Fe and Ni/Fe nanoparticles on biodegradation of phenol by
the strain Bacillus fusiformis (BFN) at various pH values.
Bioresour Technol
136:588‒594
Lin C, L Gan, ZL Chen (2010). Biodegradation
of naphthalene by strain Bacillus
fusiformis (BFN). J Hazard Mater 182:771‒777
Liu Z, W Xie, D Li, Y Peng, Z Li, S Liu (2016).
Biodegradation of phenol by bacteria strain Acinetobacter
calcoaceticus PA isolated from phenolic wastewater. Intl J Environ Res Publ Health 13:300–308
Mentzer E, D Ebere
(1996). Remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated sites. In: The proceedings of international seminar on petroleum industry and
the Nigerian Environment Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), pp:51‒59. Port-Harcourt, Nigeria
Mohanty SS, HM Jena (2017). Biodegradation
of phenol by free and immobilized cells of a novel Pseudomonas spp. NBM11. Braz J Chem Eng 34:75‒84
Paller G, RK Hommel, HP Kleber (1995). Phenol
degradation by Acinetobacter calcoaceticus NCIB 8250. J Basic
Microbiol 35:325‒335
Pan G, KI Kurumada (2008). Hybrid gel reinforced with coating
layer for removal of phenol from aqueous solution. Chem Eng J
138:194‒199
Patel JB (2001). 16S rRNA gene
sequencing for bacterial pathogen identification in the clinical laboratory.
Mol Diagnos 6:313‒321
Pradeep NV, S Anupama, K Navya, HN
Shalini, M Idris, US Hampannavar (2015). Biological removal of phenol from wastewaters: A mini
review. Appl Water Sci 5:105‒112
Priest FG, M Goodfellow, C Todd (1988). A numerical classification of the genus Bacillus. Microbiology 134:1847‒1882
Priyadharshini SD, AK Bakthavatsalam (2016). Optimization of phenol degradation by the microalga Chlorella pyrenoidosa using
Plackett–Burman Design and Response Surface Methodology. Bioresour Technol
207:150‒156
Robertson BK, M Alexander (1992). Influence of calcium
iron and pH on phosphate availability for microbial mineralization of organic
chemicals. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:38‒41
Sachan P, S Madan, A Hussain (2019).
Isolation and screening of phenol‑degrading bacteria
from pulp and paper mill effluent. Appl
Water Sci 9:100-105
Sandhu A, LJ Halverson, GA Beattie (2009). Identification and genetic characterization of phenol-degrading
bacteria from leaf microbial communities. Microb Ecol 57:2276‒2285
Santos VL, VR Linardi (2004). Biodegradation of phenol by a
filamentous fungi isolated from industrial effluents-identification and
degradation potential. Process Biochem 39:1001‒1006
Sei
K, K Asano, N Tateishi, K Mori, M Ike, M Fujita (1999). Design of PCR primers
and gene probes for the general detection of bacterial populations capable of
degrading aromatic compounds via
catechol cleavage pathways. J Biosci
Bioeng 88:542‒550
Su X, Y Wang, B Xue, Y Zhang, R Mei, Y Zhang, MZ Hashmi,
H Lin, J Chen, F Sun (2018). Resuscitation of functional bacterial community
for enhancing biodegradation of phenol under high salinity conditions based on
Rpf. Bioresour Technol 261:394‒402
Tambekar DH, SD Tale, PR Borkar (2013). Bioremediation
of phenol by haloalkaliphilic microorganisms isolated from Lonar Lake. Intl
J Sci Environ Technol 2:434‒441
Tamura K, D Peterson, N Peterson, G Stecher, M Nei, S
Kumar (2011). MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum
likelihood evolutionary distance and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol
Evol 28:2731‒2739
Thompson JD, DG Higgins, TJ Gibson (1994). CLUSTAL W:
improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through
sequence weighting position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl
Acids Res 22:4673‒4680
Tomova I, M Stoilova, E Vasileva (2014). Characterization of heavy metals resistant heterotrophic bacteria
from soils in the Windmill Islands region Wilkes Land East Antarctica. Pol Polar Res 35:593‒607
Tor A, Y Cengeloglu, ME Aydin, M Ersoz (2006). Removal
of phenol from aqueous phase by using neutralized red mud. J Colloid Interface
Sci 300:498‒503
US-EPA (1979). Phenol ambient
water quality criteria. National Service Center for Environmental
Publications (NSCEP) Criteria and Standards Division Office of Water Planning
and Standards US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USA
William S, H Feil, A Copeland (2012).
Bacterial genomic DNA isolation using CTAB. Sigma 50:1–4